More News

There are at least three problems between the City of Frederick, the Historic Preservation Commission, and Volt.

After receiving approval for the transom sign, Volt failed to obtain a zoning certificate.

Volt installed an outside menu box without approval from the Historic Preservation Commission or a zoning certificate.

Volt removed the gold leaf lettering on the transom without approval of the Historic Preservation Commission.

The Historic Preservation Commission must approve any sign change in the historic district, and all signs placed or altered in the City of Frederick regardless of location must be issued a zoning certificate.

I think the Historic Preservation Commission attempted to give a speedy approval of the original sign, recognizing the impending opening of the restaurant. In an unusual action, the commission gave Volt owners an extra hearing at the beginning of a workshop a week later, instead of making them wait a whole month.

If the commissioners were as tyrannical as perceived, they would have made them wait.

The gold lettering that read "Professional Building" appeared to be in great shape in July 2008 when the building was being renovated; I photographed it.

The Historic Preservation Commission emphasized many times, both verbally and in writing, the importance of that lettering.

I thought that placing the Volt sign in front of the gold sign was an excellent solution; it emphasized the new while leaving the old in the background.

I spoke at the hearing in support of the sign. I disagreed with two of the commissioners who were against anything in front of the gold lettering.

So how does gold lettering disappear?

Gold leaf lettering can be damaged by removing the protective coating by harsh cleaning chemicals or scratching.

Why didn't the applicant seek help when she first noticed the deterioration and knew the Historic Preservation Commission emphasized the importance of keeping the lettering? Or, as some think it was intentional, maybe due to their frustration with the commission?

Signs are signatures of the past, and the National Park Service's Preservation Brief 25 details the preservation of historic signs.

The "Professional Building" is a tangible contact for part of the building's history. Now that it is gone, where is the tangible contact of the people who occupied the building for 70-plus years? Only in the written word and in local people's memory.

I have been doing history tours of the southeast industrial section of Frederick, and people are always interested in the mostly unseen or unnoticed little features that become a talking point for me.

Isn't that a lot more interesting than pointing to a piece of bare ground/blank building and talking about what was once there?

Why is the building considered historic? It was designed by a well-known Pennsylvania architect in a style that is not common in Frederick; it has some unique features, including as the faces, scroll work and initials of some of the original occupants; curved glass windows (one of the four buildings that I know of and it has the most curved glass); a large city lot; a brick fence; and of course the destroyed gold leaf sign on the transom.

The public has negative perceptions of the Historic Preservation Commission, and rightly so. But much of what is being said about the commission happened earlier.

I've attended many of the Historic Preservation Commission meetings through the years, and I think the attitude of the commission has changed for the better. Are the present commissioners responsible for the attitudes of the previous ones? It's the history of previous commissioners' actions that can't be changed.

Gil House, Urbana

The writer is a member of the Frederick County Historical Society, which is separate from the City of Frederick's Historical Preservation Commission. The opinions expressed in this letter are his own.